Edge artificial intelligence for detecting bladed weapons: high-availability architecture with human supervision in the PMPA

Authors

  • Rogério Fernandes Oliveira Centro Universitário Internacional (UNINTER). Castanhal, Pará, Brasil Author https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9455-7269
  • Eder Bruno Bezerra Barros Universidade Norte do Paraná (UNOPAR). Castanhal, Pará, Brasil Author
  • Daniel Andrade da Silva (UNOPAR). Belém, Pará, Brasil Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69849/ye94ex82

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Weapon Detection, PMPA, Edge Server, Public Security

Abstract

The operational reality of the Military Police of Pará (PMPA) involving bladed weapons, marked by the seizure of 7,679 units in 2024, demands more efficient surveillance systems to support real-time police action. This article proposes the development of a computer vision system based on artificial intelligence for the automatic detection of such artifacts, architected to operate on edge servers within the PMPA structure, allowing identification with low latency and greater reliability. The system is conceived as a support tool under human supervision, where police action is only requested when potential threats are identified, reducing the need for constant monitoring and, consequently, the cognitive fatigue of operators, a factor that could make detection time-consuming and prone to errors, preserving the reliability of the incident by filtering out false alarms. The methodology involved training a YOLO26l model with a dataset of 2,356 post-sanitization images, focused on real-world scenarios of low light and partial occlusion, employing data balancing strategies and the intensive use of negative images (Hard Negative Mining), representing 28.4% of the total, to reduce false alarms. The results demonstrated an average accuracy of 97.19% (mAP50) with a processing speed of 28.9 FPS. These figures prove the tool's efficiency as a force multiplier, allowing for expanded surveillance capacity without the need to increase personnel.

References

AMERSHI, S. et al. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. In: CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019, Glasgow. Proceedings [...]. New York: ACM, 2019. p. 1-13. DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300233. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300233. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2026.

BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 3.688, de 3 de outubro de 1941. Lei das Contravenções Penais. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 6 out. 1941. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del3688.htm. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2026.

BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2026.

CAO, S. et al. Toward Human-In-The-Loop Prohibited Item Detection in X-Ray Baggage Images. In: CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC), 2019, [S.l.]. Proceedings [...]. [S.l.]: IEEE, 2019. p. 4360-4364. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8996933. Acesso em: 24 abr. 2026.

CAWLEY, G. C.; TALBOT, N. L. C. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 2079-2107, 2010.

GOODFELLOW, I.; BENGIO, Y.; COURVILLE, A. Deep learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.

HOLZINGER, A. Interactive Machine Learning for Health Informatics: When Do We Need the Human-in-the-Loop? Brain Informatics, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 119-131, 2016. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40708-016-0042-6. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2026.

NVIDIA. What's the Difference: Edge Computing vs. Cloud Computing. NVIDIA Blog, [S.l.], 5 jan. 2022. Disponível em: https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/difference-between-cloud-and-edge-computing/. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2026.

PARÁ. Polícia Militar do Pará. Departamento-Geral de Operações. Relatório de produtividade: ano 2024 (01 jan. a 31 de dez.). Belém: PMPA, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.pm.pa.gov.br/. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2026.

PARÁ. Secretaria de Estado de Segurança Pública e Defesa Social. Plano Estadual de Segurança Pública e Defesa Social 2022-2031. Belém: SEGUP, 2022. 131 f.: il. color. Disponível em: http://sistemas.segup.pa.gov.br/transparencia/wpcontent/uploads/2023/03/Plano-Estadual_compressed.pdf. Acesso em: 1 maio 2026.

REDMON, J.; FARHADI, A. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. arXiv preprint, [S.l.], 2018. arXiv:1804.02767. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2026.

SHI, W. et al. Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 5, p. 637-646, out. 2016. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198. Disponível em: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7488250. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2026.

ULTRALYTICS. YOLO26. [S.l.]: Ultralytics, 2026. Disponível em: https://docs.ultralytics.com/pt/models/yolo26/. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2026.

WARM, J. S.; PARASURAMAN, R.; MATTHEWS, G. Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, [S.l.], v. 50, n. 3, p. 433-441, 2008. DOI: 10.1518/001872008X312152. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1518/001872008X312152. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2026.

YIN, R. K. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6. ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2018.

ZAUNER, C.; RIPPERGER, T.; INNERHOFER-OBERPERFLER, F. A survey of perceptual hashing for multimedia. In: INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS (ICETE), 8., 2011, Seixal. Proceedings [...]. Berlin: Springer, 2011. p. 322-337.

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Oliveira, R. F., Barros, E. B. B., & Silva, D. A. da. (2026). Edge artificial intelligence for detecting bladed weapons: high-availability architecture with human supervision in the PMPA. Revista Ft, 30(158), 01-15. https://doi.org/10.69849/ye94ex82