Reliability of care in community pharmacies: standardization, team training, and indicator-based governance in service networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69849/e8spzd47Keywords:
community pharmacy, service standardization, workforce training, performance indicators, implementation science, service quality, healthcare managementAbstract
Community pharmacies operate at the intersection of retail and healthcare, making service quality and process consistency critical for patient safety and organizational sustainability. In pharmacy chains, these challenges are intensified by cross-site variability, workforce turnover, and performance pressure. This paper presents a theoretical, implementation-oriented essay proposing an operational restructuring framework built on two integrated drivers: service standardization and workforce capability building. Standardization is framed as a strategy to reduce variability and increase service reliability through the design of critical processes, service language, and safety routines—without turning the counter into a scripted interaction. Capability building is conceptualized as the development of clinical and communication competencies that translate pharmaceutical care principles into feasible, real-time community pharmacy encounters. The framework is positioned within international literature on healthcare quality and implementation science, emphasizing adoption, fidelity, feasibility, and sustainment as prerequisites for long-term viability. Finally, the paper proposes a pragmatic indicator architecture focused on process, experience, and safety metrics, recommending future prospective evaluation through simple and auditable study designs. The contribution is a replicable conceptual roadmap for both chains and independent pharmacies that preserves academic rigor without relying on context-specific empirical claims.
References
BERO, L. A. et al. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ, v. 317, n. 7156, p. 465-468, 1998. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465.
DAMSCHRODER, L. J. et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, v. 4, art. 50, 2009. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
DEMING, W. E. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1986.
DONABEDIAN, A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA, v. 260, n. 12, p. 1743-1748, 1988. DOI: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.
FIXSEN, D. L. et al. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute; National Implementation Research Network, 2005.
GLASGOW, R. E.; VOGT, T. M.; BOLES, S. M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, v. 89, n. 9, p. 1322-1327, 1999. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.
GLASGOW, R. E. et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Frontiers in Public Health, v. 7, art. 64, 2019. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064.
HEPLER, C. D.; STRAND, L. M. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, v. 47, n. 3, p. 533-543, 1990.
IVERS, N. et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, n. 6, CD000259, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
JURAN, J. M.; GODFREY, A. B. Juran’s quality handbook. 5. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, v. 70, n. 1, p. 71-79, 1992.
KOTTER, J. P. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
LANGLEY, G. J. et al. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2. ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
MICHIE, S.; VAN STRALEN, M. M.; WEST, R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, v. 6, art. 42, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
MOULLIN, J. C. et al. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Research Policy and Systems, v. 13, art. 16, 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z.
OGRINC, G. et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, v. 25, n. 12, p. 986-992, 2016. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411.
PINNOCK, H. et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ, v. 356, i6795, 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6795.
PORTER, M. E. What is value in health care? The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 363, n. 26, p. 2477-2481, 2010. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024.
PROCTOR, E. et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, v. 38, n. 2, p. 65-76, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
PROCTOR, E. K.; POWELL, B. J.; MCMILLEN, J. C. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science, v. 8, art. 139, 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.
ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. 5. ed. New York: Free Press, 2003.
SENGE, P. M. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 1990.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Medication without harm: global patient safety challenge on medication safety. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.
WIEDENMAYER, K. et al. Developing pharmacy practice: a focus on patient care. Geneva: World Health Organization; The Hague: International Pharmaceutical Federation, 2006.
YIN, R. K. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Giselle Ávila Sousa (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
"Os Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
-
Os Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Esta licença permite que o trabalho seja compartilhado, copiado e adaptado em qualquer suporte ou formato, para qualquer fim, inclusive comercial, desde que seja atribuído o devido crédito de autoria e de publicação inicial nesta revista.
-
Os Autores têm autorização para assumir compromissos contratuais adicionais separadamente, para a distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
-
A revista permite e incentiva os autores a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) após o processo de edição e publicação, pois isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado."
